ESG Performance and the Cost of Equity Capital: A Review of Evidence with Special Reference to India

Home Articles

ESG Performance and the Cost of Equity Capital: A Review of Evidence with Special Reference to India

Sohom Majumder1, Arit Das2, Sruti Basu3

1 Assistant Professor, Department of Business Administration, JIS College of Engineering

2,3 MBA student, Department of Business Administration, JIS College of Engineering

Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) considerations have increasingly become part of corporate financial decision-making and investor assessment. One important question is whether better ESG performance enables firms to obtain equity finance at a lower cost. Existing research, however, does not provide completely uniform findings. Several studies argue that strong ESG performance and disclosure reduce information asymmetry, improve corporate reputation, lower perceived risk and attract a wider investor base, thereby reducing the cost of equity. Other studies suggest that excessive ESG expenditure, agency problems, greenwashing and disagreement among ESG rating agencies can increase uncertainty and financing costs. This paper reviews the theoretical and empirical literature on the relationship between ESG and the cost of equity, with particular emphasis on India. The review indicates that recent evidence increasingly supports a negative ESG-cost of-equity relationship, although the magnitude and direction depend on ESG dimensions, disclosure quality, institutional environment, industry characteristics and rating methodologies. The paper concludes that credible and standardized ESG reporting is particularly important in emerging markets such as India.

Keywords: ESG, cost of equity, sustainability, ESG disclosure, information asymmetry, ESG ratings, India

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21888006

Cite as: Majumder, S., Das, A., & Basu, S. (2026). ESG Performance and the Cost of Equity Capital: A Review of Evidence with Special Reference to India. JIS Management Nexus, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21888006